ALBANY, N.Y. — Gov. Kathy Hochul is refusing to back down on New York City’s congestion pricing plan, rejecting a directive from the Trump administration to halt toll collection by March 21. The governor clarified that the state will continue implementing the controversial program, which imposes a $9 toll on vehicles entering Manhattan’s busiest areas.
The federal order, issued last week, called for an immediate pause, citing economic concerns and potential harm to local businesses. But Hochul dismissed the demand, emphasizing New York’s right to control its traffic policies.
“We are not backing down,” Hochul said Friday. “This is about reducing congestion, improving air quality, and funding vital public transit. The federal government should respect our authority.”
A Policy Shift with Political Consequences
Hochul’s stance marks a significant shift from her early career as an anti-toll advocate. As a county clerk in upstate New York, she fought against toll hikes on the New York State Thruway. At the time, she built a reputation as a “stop-the-tolls pioneer,” a label that once resonated with her political base. Critics accuse her of hypocrisy, arguing that her embrace of congestion pricing contradicts her previous positions.
“The governor spent years fighting tolls,” said Assemblyman Michael Lawler (R-Pearl River). “Now, she’s pushing a policy that burdens commuters and small businesses. It’s a complete reversal.”
Supporters, however, argue that New York City’s needs differ from those of upstate regions. They say congestion pricing is essential to unclogging streets, reducing emissions, and generating funds for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA).
Economic and Environmental Stakes
The congestion pricing plan, approved in 2019 but delayed due to legal and political battles, aims to raise $1 billion annually for the MTA. The agency relies on these funds for subway and bus improvements, system upgrades, and modernization efforts.
Business leaders remain divided. Some argue that the tolls will deter customers and hurt midtown and lower Manhattan commerce. Others contend that smoother traffic flow will boost productivity and make the city more accessible.
“This plan helps workers, businesses, and the environment,” said MTA Chair Janno Lieber. “The funding it provides is critical for keeping the city moving.”
Environmental advocates also back the policy, pointing to data showing that congestion pricing in London and Stockholm led to lower pollution and faster commutes. New York officials expect similar results, estimating a 15% drop in traffic volume and a corresponding reduction in carbon emissions.
A Legal and Political Showdown
Hochul’s defiance sets the stage for a legal battle with the federal government. The Trump administration argues that the tolls amount to an unfair tax on drivers, disproportionately affecting lower-income commuters. Federal officials have hinted at potential lawsuits if New York does not comply with the deadline.
State leaders appear ready for a fight. Attorney General Letitia James signaled her office’s readiness to defend the congestion pricing program in court.
“This policy was passed legally, and we will stand by it,” James said. “New York has the right to manage its transportation system.”
The conflict underscores a broader political divide over infrastructure funding and urban planning. Trump administration officials have framed the tolls as an overreach by Democratic leadership, while New York lawmakers insist they are necessary for maintaining a functioning public transit system.
Public Reaction and Next Steps
New Yorkers remain split. Some drivers view the tolls as an unfair financial burden, while many transit riders see them as a necessary investment.
“I get it—it’s frustrating to pay more,” said Bronx resident Luis Mendez. “But the subway needs help. If this fixes things, I support it.”
On the other hand, small business owner Carla DeLuca fears the impact on deliveries and customer traffic.
“We already pay enough taxes,” DeLuca said. “Now they want to charge us just to get into the city? It’s ridiculous.”
Despite opposition, the program is moving forward. Unless courts intervene, congestion pricing will take effect in June. Hochul remains resolute, positioning herself as a leader willing to make tough decisions for the city’s future.
“This is about progress,” she said. “We are building a cleaner, more efficient New York, and I won’t let politics get in the way.”
The coming weeks will determine whether the state can hold its ground or if federal pressure forces a recalibration. One thing is certain—New York’s congestion pricing fight is far from over.
Mathew Alvarez joined Rockland Daily News as a reporter in March 2020, but he’s no stranger to Rockland County. He grew up in New City and graduated from Ball State’s College of Communication, Information, and Media.